CASD has Failed to State a Claim for Indemnification or Contribution for the Alleged Federal Civil Rights Violations

However, because it is dispositive of the federal-law claims in Counts I and II, the Court will address first the issue of whether the Attorneys can be held liable for indemnity or contribution based on their alleged conduct and advice in their representation of CASD with respect to the Plaintiffs. Both Ellison and R&S move to dismiss CASD's Joinder Complaint in its entirety on a variety of grounds. In Counts IV and V of the Joinder Complaint, CASD asserts that the Attorneys are liable to it for malpractice, under tort law and contract law, respectively. In Count III of the Joinder Complaint, CASD asserts that if it is liable to the Plaintiffs for violation of the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law, then the Attorneys are 'liable over to by way of contribution and/or indemnity' and are 'jointly and/or severally liable with to Hawa and Powell.' Id. In Counts I and II of the Joinder Complaint, CASD asserts that if it is found liable to the Plaintiffs for violations of their civil rights, the Attorneys are 'liable over to by way of contribution and/or indemnity' and are 'jointly and/or severally liable with CASD to. 64) and consequently, will not be repeated here.Д¬ASD has filed third-party claims against the Attorneys, who represented it in connection with some of the events that are the subject of Plaintiffs' lawsuit, based on the allegedly deficient advice the Attorneys gave to CASD in connection with its employment of the Plaintiffs and their conduct in the course of that representation. The factual allegations pertaining to this case are set forth in this Court's MaMemorandum Opinion (Doc. and the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law, 43 Pa. В§ 794 the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa.

the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 70) ('Plaintiffs' Complaint') alleges claims against CASD and its former Superintendent, Angelo Romaniello ('Romaniello'), arising under 42 U.S.C. Plaintiffs' current Second Amended Complaint (Doc. On August 26, 2015, Plaintiffs Abdallah Hawa ('Hawa') and Teresa Powell ('Powell') (collectively, the 'Plaintiffs') commenced this action against CASD, alleging federal civil rights claims and state-law claims arising from their discovery of racist text messages about them sent between CASD administrators, and from various retaliatory actions allegedly taken by CASD in the aftermath of that discovery. Accordingly, Counts III-V will be dismissed without prejudice so that they may be brought in state court. For the reasons that follow, the Motions will be granted as to the federal-law claims in Counts I and II, and the Court will exercise its discretion not to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims in Counts III-V. Ellison and R&S (collectively, the 'Attorneys') ask this Court to dismiss CASD's Joinder Complaint in its entirety. 87) and by Third-Party Defendant Rhoads & Sinon LLP ('R&S') (Doc. 73) ('Joinder Complaint') filed by Third-Party Defendant James Ellison, Esquire ('Ellison') (Doc.

Gita Siddharth as Mrs.MARILYN HEFFLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGEД«efore this Court are Motions to Dismiss Third-Party Plaintiff Coatesville Area School District's ('CASD') First Amended Joinder Complaint (Doc.

Kulbhushan Kharbanda as Mahendra Pratap Singh.

But they find out that the main culprit is not their father but someone else. Raju and Devi try to avenge against their father Mahendra. She instills hatred against Mahendra in Raju, right from his childhood. While in jail she gives birth to a son and names hin Raju.

Pregnant Geeta is sentenced to 14 years of imprisonment. The murdered lawyers and Mahendra gave testimony against her in the court. Thereafter Geeta is arrested on charge of murder of another lawyer. But, while leaving he threatens Mahendra and swears to take revenge. Seeing her mother in such a difficult situation Devilal decides to leave his mother himself so that she would be rescued from making a choice. Finally he asks Geeta to make a choice between him and her son. The woman he marries is a widow named Geeta, who has a son named Devilal. He gets married again after his wife's death. Mahendra Pratap Singh is a lawyer who live a wealthy lifestyle.

Hawa hawa e hawa orginal actor